Forensic Database

The forensic research database helps you find thousands of resources about forensic science & technology, the law of scientific evidence & expert witnesses, and more. Find:

Law Enforcement Technology

Check out records about law enforcement technology in NCSTL's forensic database... learn more

Search Forensic Database

court decisions & legislation
legal & scientific publications
news & media
websites & organizations
educational opportunities
webcasts & multimedia

Better than a general search engine, the unique database instantly pinpoints focused results about forensic science & criminal justice.

Top Forensic News Story

What's New At NCSTL ... is used as a resource in over 170 countries

New Grant Awarded to NCSTL

The National Clearinghouse for Science, Technology and the Law at Stetson University College of Law in Gulfport, Florida, has been awarded an additional $400,000 grant from the Bureau of Justice Assistance at the Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs. This additional funding, part of BJA's Capital Litigation Initiative, allows NCSTL to expand its production of Crime Scene to Courtroom Forensics live seminars and webinars. These sessions are designed to educate death penalty litigators, both prosecution and defense, in forensic sciences.

New online course offered: Locating, Evaluating and Selecting Expert Witnesses

The National Clearinghouse for Science, Technology and the Law at Stetson University College of Law and The Law Enforcement Innovation Center (LEIC) at the University of Tennessee’s Institute for Public Service have launched an innovative online course Locating, Evaluating and Selecting Expert Witnesses.

The course has been approved for 3.5 General CLE credits and .5 CLE Ethics credits, 3.5 P.O.S.T. credits for law enforcement professionals and 1 American Board of Criminalistics (ABC) recertification credit. The course uses video clips in addition to lecture and PowerPoint to deliver an engaging type of CLE/CE. The course also demonstrates how the NCSTL database, which has over one million visitors from over 170 countries, may be used for research in scientific evidence.

This online course focuses on:

  • Factors that influence the selection of an expert
  • The importance of investigating an expert's credentials
  • How to make an informed decision of an expert's credibility
  • Legal standards of admissibility of scientific evidence
  • Attorney's ethics in dealing with experts

Register for the course.

NCSTL and LEIC are recipients of the prestigious August Vollmer Excellence in Forensic Science Award for Innovation in Forensic Technology (2010 and 2007 respectively) from the International Association of Chiefs of Police. Our two organizations have collectively trained over 43,500 lawyers, judges, law enforcement professionals, and forensic scientists.

Capital Litigation Initiative: Crime Scene to Courtroom Forensics Webinar

Forensic Pathology Essentials is the third in a series of eight FREE webinars and is part of the Capital Litigation Initiative: Crime Scene to Courtroom Forensics Training. Forensic Pathology Essentials, featuring videos and conversations with medical examiners who are forensic pathology experts, lets you discover what happens to a body from the crime scene to the autopsy. This webinar will take you through the process of how an autopsy is conducted, with forensic reviews of the body, including head, neck, chest, abdomen, arm, and skin. The webinar will feature science and observation involving strangulation, blunt trauma, poisoning, stab wounds, and more.

Attendees who complete the course will be eligible for free CLE credits. If you have questions, or for further information, contact Stetson’s Office of Professional Education at 727-562-7898 or email

PCAST Report -- Forensic Science in Criminal Courts: Ensuring Scientific Validity of Feature Comparison Methods

PCAST Report

PCAST, the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, released a report on September 20, 2016, discussing the role of scientific validity in the legal system. The report, Forensic Science in Criminal Courts: Ensuring Scientific Validity of Feature-Comparison Methods, evaluated validity of seven areas:

  • DNA analysis of single-source and simple-mixture samples
  • DNA analysis of complex-mixture samples
  • Bitemark anaysis
  • Latent fingerprint analysis
  • firearms analysis
  • footwear anaylsis
  • hair analysis
  • The report concludes by making several recommendations to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), the Organization for Scientific Area Committees (OSAC), the FBI Laboratory, the U.S. Attorney General, and the Judiciary.

    Several organizations responded to the PCAST Report, including:

    For more information on the PCAST Report, see


    NCSTL has forged associations with international centers of forensic excellence. Congratulations are due to two of NCSTL’s international colleagues, Professor Sue Black and Professor Claude Roux for their recent outstanding awards.

    Professor Sue Black, OBE, FRSE, PhD (University of Aberdeen) and Director of the Centre for Anatomy and Human Identification at the University of Dundee was named to lead the new Leverhulme Research Centre for Forensic Science at the University of Dundee. The University was granted a £ 10 million award by the Leverhulme Trust to establish a research center aimed at shaping the future of forensic science. Earlier this year, Professor Black and her colleague, Professor Niamh Nic Daeid organized The Royal Society's Meeting, “The Paradigm Shift for UK Forensic Science” and led the working group meeting that followed at Chicheley Hall during which a small group of international judges, scientists, policy makers, and lawyers met to discuss the current scientific landscape, and to identify research gaps and make suggestions for additional research in law and science.

    Professor Claude Roux, BSc, PhD (University of Lausanne, Switzerland), Faculty of Science, University of Technology Sydney was awarded the prestigious Deputy Vice-Chancellor’s Medal for Research Impact. The award acknowledged the outstanding contributions made by Dr. Roux's research outside the academic community. Examples of Dr. Roux’s accomplishments, among others, are new cutting-edge and validated methods and techniques for the analysis of forensic evidence, in particular in the areas of trace evidence and fingerprint detection and leading the development of a new discipline, forensic intelligence. Dr. Roux’s work has been fundamental to the development of forensic science in Australia over the past 20 years.

    What's new?

    The Department of Justice is seeking public comments on two revised subcommittee work products of the National Commission on Forensic Science, one related to forensic report contents, and the other related to statistical statements in forensic testimony. The public may view and comment on these documents online at More information about the comment process can be found on the Department of Justice website. Comments will be accepted through March 20, 2017.

    Education and Training
    Capital Litigation picture

    A new grant in the amount of $400,000 was awarded to Stetson University College of Law for the National Clearinghouse for Science, Technology and the Law (NCSTL) to develop a forensic evidence training program for lawyers who work on death penalty cases. “This training program is crucial at a time when life or death often hinges on the presentation of forensic evidence in the courtroom,” said NCSTL Founding Director and Professor of Law Carol Henderson.

    The grant, awarded by the U.S. Attorney General as part of the Adjudication and Law Enforcement National Initiatives, will support the development of a “Crime Scene to Courtroom Forensics” program. The new training program will provide in-person and webinar training on forensic science evidence and the use of expert testimony.

    “Training in forensic evidence is essential to improve the quality of legal representation and to ensure reliable jury verdicts,” said Henderson. Stetson’s National Clearinghouse was developed to foster communication between the scientific, technological and legal communities, providing comprehensive scientific, technological and legal information to promote justice based on sound science and technology. The NCSTL has trained more than 13,500 legal and scientific professionals since its inception in-person and online. The NCSTL has released the following CLE/CE Programs: SANE-SART Training for Forensic Nurses, A Collaboration Between NCSTL and SANE-SART Resource Services, Law 101: Legal Guide for the Forensic Expert, sponsored by National Institute of Justice (NIJ), housed on, billed by NIJ as "one of the most popular courses EVER", Forensic Science Course for Capital Litigators - Self-Study which focuses on forensic science. Legal Guide for the Forensic Expert has been a very popular course published on two years ago.

    Under grants from the Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA), NCSTL has conducted many training in-person workshops on the use of forensic science in capital cases over the past several years. See Education and Training Section of this website. In 2016, two more in-person workshops will be conducted for prosecutors and defense attorneys - who litigate capital cases.

    Information about the in-person training and the webinars as well as the application required to attend the training will be posted here by the end of November, 2015.

    What is NCSTL? is the only online resource in the world that concentrates on the nexus of science, technology, and the law. Focusing on forensic science and scientific evidence, educates and shares information with scientists, legal professionals, law enforcement, academics, and the public.

    Learn more about

    How we help you provides:

    Thursday Apr 27, 2017

    Elder Abuse Computerized Decision Support System
    Through the National Criminal Justice Reference Service, NIJ has made available the following final technical report (this report is the result of an NIJ-funded project but was not published by the U.S. Department of Justice):

    Author: Kendon J. Conrad, Ph.D.

    Abstract: Claims of elder mistreatment can often go unsubstantiated. Researchers in this project looked to determine if computer-assisted assessments could improve the handling of these claims while increasing the substantiation rate of elder abuse cases.
    The Elder Abuse Decision Support System (EADSS) was designed and developed through previous NIJ-funded grants to facilitate computer-assisted assessment of allegations of abuse, standardize substantiation decision-making, provide user-friendly scoring and reporting, and link care planning to case specifics.

    The resulting reports and databases that EADSS generates can be used to monitor and track case work and outcomes more effectively. They also compute agency and system-wide statistics useful in evaluation, planning and research.

    The aims of this study were to:
    • Implement and improve EADSS as an investigation and intervention system usable in the field.
    • Determine the efficacy of EADSS for improving individual assessment, reporting, intervention and end-user utility as compared to standard protocols with six agencies in Illinois serving as a test bed.
    • Estimate the psychometric properties of EADSS measures of abuse, neglect and exploitation.

    Dr Welner on Lowering American Islamist Violence Risk

    Former Secretary of Education Bill Bennett invited Dr. Welner to discuss Dr. Welner’s proposals for mitigating Islamist risk in America onto "Morning in America". Dr. Welner asserted that it was necessary to dismiss a number of oft-repeated false assertions as deliberate manipulations by informed authorities seeking to avoid addressing violence risks and risk factors of potential perpetrators, specifically:

    • Islamist terror is not Islam
    • Adherents to Radical Islamist thinking are very few in number
    • America is responsible for creating intense Muslim hostility towards this country
    • We are not at war with Islam
    • Frank discussion of Islamist terrorism endangers American Muslims
    In their extended discussion, Dr. Welner proposed a number of policy prescriptions for mitigating risk. Dr. Welner’s recommendations, which have since been re-published by the Investigative Project for Terrorism and the New English Review, include:
    • Flipping the paradigm to focus on how American Muslims can actively defuse national anxieties of Americans who witness Islamist terrorism, rather than Americans’ alleviating anxieties of attacks on Muslims, which are altogether rare
    • Branding America and how it has helped Muslims around the world
    • Promoting Muslim attitudes reflecting loyalty to America first
    • Encouraging mosque, parental, and family responsibility to self-police communities in order to root out radical nihilists who recruit others and ensnare young people
    • Financially support Muslim institutions’ efforts to root out terrorism from within communities
    • Promote humor and the arts to promote the marginalizing, reform, and self-regulation of Islamist intolerance
    • Retake the campuses from rejectionist Islam, prevent access of radical leadership
    • Retake the prisons from intolerant imams who groom new and alienated adherents and feed angry violent wannabees into the community
    • Ban investment by governments and large donors promoting radical Islam from American media, campaigns, and academic institutions
    • End American backdoor funding and support of countries and entities that collaborate with Islamist terror
    • Expose and root out Islamist contributions to political candidates and to media entities
    • Full security screening of federal employees in sensitive positions who do not currently undergo security clearance
    • End exclusion of Jewish Arabic speakers by American intelligence services, who are available but not relied upon for gathering human intelligence